Indexes
The following stories have received the most reader comments during the last 7 days.
- Democratic candidates aren't worthy (95)
- Should Hillary Clinton drop out of the campaign because of Barack Obama's success? (39)
- When Obama says he wants change, just what does he mean, exactly? (33)
- Senior Projects: Invaluable LUSD program may be endangered (32)
- Good instructors — but hard times (31)
- Woman killed in crash at mailbox (24)
- Let's face it: Lodi's beloved Grape Bowl has become a dump (21)
- Form 700s (15)
- What To Cut? PE? Lunch? Woodshop? (15)
- Lodi man rescues elderly woman from oncoming train (15)
Drivers of GrapeLine, Dial-A-Ride join union
After months of rhetoric, supporters say union is upping wages, benefits
News-Sentinel Staff Writer
Lodi's bus drivers are now union members.
Following months of divisive rhetoric, alleged racial slurs and even "union busting," 38 GrapeLine and Dial-A-Ride drivers have joined the Sacramento-based Amalgamated Transit Union Local 256.
Though they drive city buses, the workers are not city employees. They're employed by Fairfield-based MV Transportation.
Union supporters say joining ATM Local 256 has already boosted wages and benefits, and will safeguard worker's rights.
"Those people in Lodi, those drivers, are going to become happier. And they're going to end up career drivers ... in the long run, the city of Lodi is going to benefit," said Vincent Contino, president of Stockton-based ATU Local 276, who helped lead the union effort in Lodi.
Leaders with MV Transportation say they never opposed workers joining a union. It was the "scare tactics" and misinformation used by union supporters that frustrated them, said Nikki Frenney, a company spokeswoman.
"We don't have an adversarial relationship with the unions," she added.
The bus drivers held a vote in November on whether to join the union. But because they tied, 20 to 20, the effort failed.
Union organizers, however, appealed to the National Labor Relations Board, claiming the transit company had coerced workers not to join the union.
The labor board ruled April 1 in favor of the union. That allowed for last month's new and successful vote.
Contino, the union organizer, claimed "union busters" were brought in last fall to intimidate pro-union drivers and even followed some employees home. Signs reading "No Union" were also displayed at work sites, he said.
The city's union groups include:
Source: City of Lodi
MV Transportation has denied the allegations.
Teresa Farmer, a GrapeLine driver who led union efforts in Lodi, said she's "proud" to be part of ATU once again.
Farmer began driving buses in 1970 for the city of Stockton. She said the union took care of its workers then and will now.
She added that drivers who had opposed the union will be very pleased when their pay is increased.
Without the union's bargaining power, Farmer said she would have waited several years before seeing a raise — something MV denies.
MV Transportation starts its Lodi drivers at $12.25 per hour, according to company records.
Contino, the Stockton-based union organizer, said Lodi drivers have already seen a $0.95 per hour increase in pay.
Frenney, the transit company spokeswoman, said she could not confirm that.
MV Transportation's contract with the city is up for renewal this spring. The company, along with Paris-based Veolia Transit, has submitted a bid for the job.
City spokesman Jeff Hood said the contract could be awarded late this month.
He added that the city does not expect bus fares to rise because of the union issue.
Contact reporter Chris Nichols at chrisn@lodinews.com.

Reader Feedback
LodiJoe wrote on May 9, 2008 9:00 AM:
T & C wrote on May 2, 2008 5:05 PM:
T & C wrote on May 2, 2008 5:04 PM:
T & C wrote on May 2, 2008 5:03 PM:
T & C wrote on May 2, 2008 5:01 PM:
The union brought in Union drivers harassing and intimidating drivers to join, appealing to their "DREAMS of 30 day paid vACATIONS, full time SHIFTS FOR EVERYONE, NO CHANCE OF BEING TERMINATED... All the while getting in the way of us paying passengers who needed to get on or off buses! If Union members had a legal right to present one side of the equation of Unions in bus companies, management had the right to present the other side of the eauation. It's called maintaining a balance. Continued... "
T & C wrote on May 2, 2008 4:53 PM:
T & C wrote on May 2, 2008 4:51 PM:
T & C wrote on May 2, 2008 4:48 PM:
papercut wrote on May 2, 2008 3:50 PM:
Miss Daisy wrote on May 2, 2008 1:24 PM:
NotStuckInLodi wrote on May 2, 2008 11:57 AM:
NotStuckInLodi wrote on May 2, 2008 11:49 AM:
Miss Daisy wrote on May 2, 2008 11:32 AM:
papercut wrote on May 2, 2008 10:20 AM:
papercut wrote on May 2, 2008 10:18 AM:
Scrutiny wrote on May 2, 2008 9:42 AM:
Miss Daisy wrote on May 2, 2008 9:19 AM:
papercut wrote on May 2, 2008 8:28 AM:
If the NLRB ruled in favor of the union, there must've been some damning evidence that MV intimidated certain parties. Of course, I wouldn't expect the whole and true story from this paper.
How dare the union come to Lodi and offer these employees a decent paying job with benefits&job security?
"
shagoofta85 wrote on May 2, 2008 7:53 AM:
newsguy wrote on May 2, 2008 6:52 AM: