Indexes
The following stories have received the most reader comments during the last 7 days.
- Why your newspaper, and local Web site, are struggling (130)
- The candidates on evil (124)
- Don't listen to 'Big Oil' (91)
- Reynolds Ranch developer wants hotel, senior housing, more commercial space (52)
- Commission questions Reynolds Ranch changes, delays vote (48)
- Democrats simply don't 'get it' (41)
- Lodi Police Cadets helping with problem of vacant homes (35)
- Bus service to Elkhorn cut for good (35)
- High birth rate to boost San Joaquin County population (34)
- 'All I saw was a face full of teeth' (29)
History in the making
Same-sex marriages are set for today
News-Sentinel Staff Writer
History will be made at 8 a.m. today in Stockton and Sacramento.
Marriage licenses for same-sex couples will be issued in San Joaquin, Sacramento and California's 56 other counties in response to the California Supreme Court legalizing gay marriage by a 4-3 vote on May 15.
Sacramento County's Recorder-County Clerk's Office promises to be crowded because it has at least 70 appointments for gay and straight weddings today, Assistant Clerk-Recorder Wanda Dark said last week. And it was busy on Monday, with callers unable to get through.
Three calls to Dark on Monday resulted in the recording: "We are experiencing a large volume of calls. Please try again later."
Meanwhile, in Stockton, San Joaquin County officials don't know what to expect because they don't make appointments, Teresa Williamson, operations manager for the county Recorder-County Clerk's Office, said Monday afternoon.
Gay marriage became legal statewide at 5:01 p.m. Monday. County offices had the option of remaining open after 5 or to wait until this morning to issue marriage licenses. San Francisco and Yolo were among the counties that remained open after 5 p.m. on Monday.
Starting today, marriage licenses no longer list the bride and groom. The forms now list couples as "Party A" and "Party B," just in case they are the same gender.
There will be distinct differences in format among San Joaquin and Sacramento counties. In downtown Sacramento and Fair Oaks, the County Clerk-Recorder's Office will perform actual ceremonies in a small chapel.
But in Stockton, wedding ceremonies have never been performed at the Recorder-County Clerk's Office, Williamson said. Straight and same-sex couples alike will merely fill out paperwork and receive a license, she said.
Ken Owen of Lodi, a conservative Christian who is founder and director of Christian Community Concerns, said he has urged county Supervisor Ken Vogel and Recorder-County Clerk Gary Freeman to postpone any gay marriages in San Joaquin County until after the November election, when voters will decide whether to overturn the Supreme Court's ruling and limit marriage to one man and one woman.
Licenses for same-sex couples will be available at 8 a.m. today in Stockton and Sacramento.
San Joaquin County
When: Weekdays, 8 a.m. to 4 p.m.
Where: Recorder-County Clerk's Office on the second floor of the Pacific State Bank building, 6 S. El Dorado St., Stockton.
Information: 468-3939, www.sjgov.org/Recorder.
Sacramento County
When: Weekdays, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.; Thursdays, 8 a.m. to 8 p.m.; this week only, 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. Tuesday through Thursday. In Fair Oaks, hours are 9 a.m. to 4 p.m.
Where: 600 Eighth St. at F Street, Sacramento; 5229-B Hazel Ave. at Madison Avenue, Fair Oaks.
Information and appointments: (916) 874-6334, www.ccr.saccounty.net/MARFAQ.asp.
Source: San Joaquin and Sacramento counties
Local views on gay marriage
Ken Owen
Director/founder
Christian Community Concerns
Lodi

"I think (the marriage initiative is) a do or die for the homosexuals and the Christian community and the citizens at large. For homosexuals, they want the word 'marriage.' This is going to set them back. It's do or die for the institution of marriage. Marriage will not exist as we know it if this constitutional amendment is not passed."
Bob Mattheis
Retired Lutheran pastor
Lodi

"The gay and lesbian people I know are honest people, people of integrity who deserve to be able to live with a partner with the same legal and financial responsibilities and privileges that go with marriage.
"What was the culture of the Old Testament, and what force does the Old Testament have in our life today? All Christians choose to ignore certain passages of scripture which are violent and mean-spirited — stoning, adultery, killing all inhabitants of a city or village that was conquered, those kinds of things."
— News-Sentinel staff
Contact reporter Ross Farrow at rossf@lodinews.com.

Reader Feedback
Jess wrote on Jun 28, 2008 10:19 AM:
Billy Rubin wrote on Jun 28, 2008 9:00 AM:
I've listened (as have you, apparently) to Michael Wiener-Savage make the same ridiculous claim and he has been unable to substantiate it.
Can you?
How does recruitment work? How exactly do they accomplish that?
How does the "Gay Lobby" work?
Let's see some details.
And by the way, what ever happened to that "Falcon" character? "
Brian wrote on Jun 27, 2008 8:22 AM:
Brian wrote on Jun 27, 2008 8:21 AM:
" It's easier to feel empowered by hating a powerless group than to fight the powers that be.
How ignorant you are to say that the gay community does not have any power.
I would argue that they have a lot of power indeed and the majority of them don't play the powerless victim as you and Lodian make them out to be.
Perhaps
a formal apology to the gay community for your blanket statement would be suitable. "
Brian wrote on Jun 27, 2008 8:15 AM:
" Brian wrote "Do you realize the gay community wants more strength and more numbers will help this?"
Brian: You don't know much about the gay community. "
Lodian, perhaps I don't know as much as you. However, your denial that there is strength in numbers goes against everything that that most perople have been taught.
Lodian, give me some evidence that the gay community does not want to grow and I'll sell you some beachfront property in Blythe, CA. "
Lodian wrote on Jun 24, 2008 9:13 PM:
shrubeater wrote on Jun 24, 2008 8:07 AM:
shrubeater wrote on Jun 24, 2008 8:03 AM:
shrubeater wrote on Jun 24, 2008 8:01 AM:
Lodian wrote on Jun 23, 2008 8:50 PM:
shrubeater: No one here that is against gay marriage has offered any valid reason why gay marriage is detrimental to anyone. That is because there is NO reason why gays should not be married. The only reasons they (the ones that deny gays their rights) give are religious reasons. We should remember that this is about civil rights, not religion. Thank GOD! "
Lodian wrote on Jun 23, 2008 8:43 PM:
Brian: You don't know much about the gay community. "
shrubeater wrote on Jun 23, 2008 6:04 PM:
Brian wrote on Jun 22, 2008 6:53 PM:
Shrub,That said, then why did you feel the need to bring up hetero divorce rate? Is it somehow going to go down because there are a lot of heteros that are closet gays that want to be in a same sex marriage? Do you realize the gay community wants more strength and more numbers will help this? This is one of the reasons why the vast majority of society is opposed to same sex marriage. "
voter wrote on Jun 22, 2008 6:13 PM:
shrubeater wrote on Jun 22, 2008 6:07 PM:
girard74 wrote on Jun 22, 2008 3:40 PM:
And this, of course goes both ways. The word 'conservative' is rarely spoken with respect from those on the left. While I cannot expect anyone to follow my advice, but I have suggested that in response to those who personally attack others in a feeble attempt to further their causes they should simply be ignored, although I realize just how difficult it is to do. "
voter wrote on Jun 22, 2008 3:18 PM:
girard74 wrote on Jun 22, 2008 3:09 PM:
And this, of course goes both ways. The word 'conservative' is rarely spoken with respect from those on the left. While I cannot expect anyone to follow my advice, but I have suggested that in response to those who personally attack others in a feeble attempt to further their causes they should simply be ignored, although I realize just how difficult it is to do. "
voter wrote on Jun 22, 2008 2:59 PM:
girard74 wrote on Jun 22, 2008 2:54 PM:
Further, if they believe in Christianity and yet continue with their lifestyle I do NOT believe that they will be condemned to Hell. If they are, then I will be warming up right beside them in the nether regions because of my own spiritual failings. "
voter wrote on Jun 22, 2008 2:44 PM:
girard74 wrote on Jun 22, 2008 2:31 PM:
shrubeater wrote on Jun 22, 2008 2:28 PM:
voter wrote on Jun 22, 2008 2:13 PM:
shrubeater wrote on Jun 22, 2008 1:58 PM:
shrubeater wrote on Jun 22, 2008 1:30 PM:
Brian wrote on Jun 22, 2008 1:13 PM:
Shrub, And this tiny, tiny part of society has such a huge impact on how the whole education system will have to be changed
when it comes to how marriage is viewed.
There are many distinct differences between a man and a woman.
To quote Winston Wallace:
"With the legalization of homosexual marriage, public schools in the nation will be required to teach that this perversion is the moral equivalent of traditional marriage between a man and a woman. Textbooks, even in conservative states, will have to depict man/man and woman/woman relationships, and stories written for children as young as elementary school, or even kindergarten, will have to give equal space to homosexuals."
To be a proponent of same sex marriage
you should take responsibility for the actions of children that may have trouble understanding the distincet differences between a man and a women as a result of same sex marriage education in public schools. "
girard74 wrote on Jun 22, 2008 11:55 AM:
And I suspected as much. My 'explaining' to you what I 'may' do with regard to my religious activities wasn't out of any defense to your comment. I was simply affording you reasonable explanations as to why those who may further their beliefs on these blogs on a Sunday morning could very well be attending 'church' in ways unknown to those desiring to belittle them. "
shrubeater wrote on Jun 22, 2008 11:53 AM:
girard74 wrote on Jun 22, 2008 11:42 AM:
While you may consider the matter to be a 'distraction,' there are many others who obviously believe it to be much more than that. You should understand that many Americans actually live their lives according to their faith (as best as they can); not merely as an extension of it. This causes issues such as homosexuality, same-sex marriage, divorce, abortion and many others to be of extreme relevance to them. And there is really nothing wrong with that.
Yet just as those who do not live according to any spiritual faith should never be 'forced' to believe otherwise, the same consideration should be afforded to them who do.
With the amendment to the California Constitution looming over us, this 'distraction' will certainly become front-page news up to and long after the election in November. It simply is not going to go away.
I will refrain from commenting further on your reference to 'abortion' as I do not desire to 'go there' today. "
shrubeater wrote on Jun 22, 2008 11:39 AM:
shrubeater wrote on Jun 22, 2008 11:36 AM:
shrubeater wrote on Jun 22, 2008 11:32 AM:
girard74 wrote on Jun 22, 2008 11:31 AM:
Wow! I missed this little gem. There you are attempting to quote the Bible to further your insistence that people should not judge others and then turn right around and judge me for not being in church. I hope that your tongue was planted firmly within your cheek when you posted that, although it is impossible to tell.
How do you know I didn't attend an earlier service? How do you know that I don't attend 'church' through my television? How do you know that I don't worship God in my own home by reading His Word and praying to him in private? "
shrubeater wrote on Jun 22, 2008 11:28 AM:
girard74 wrote on Jun 22, 2008 11:26 AM:
Of course you meant the passage in Matthew that states 'Judge not, lest ye be judged.' There are many others, but I really don't think we want to get off on this tangent. There are many learned theologians who disagree that these Biblical passages deny us the responsibility to 'judge' others. In short, they are presented for us to first look to ourselves before casting aspersions on anyone else. "
shrubeater wrote on Jun 22, 2008 11:24 AM:
shrubeater wrote on Jun 22, 2008 11:19 AM:
shrubeater wrote on Jun 22, 2008 11:15 AM:
shrubeater wrote on Jun 22, 2008 11:12 AM:
shrubeater wrote on Jun 22, 2008 11:09 AM:
Brian wrote on Jun 22, 2008 10:30 AM:
Good point Girard74. I may not be quite as polished on my writing skills as you.
I do try. "
Brian wrote on Jun 22, 2008 10:28 AM:
You got that right. And this is why we should maintain the Christian foundation of this nation. To not maintain it and let it crumble because
a very small percentage of the population wants their way is selfish and obsurd and I won't have any part of this narcisism. "
girard74 wrote on Jun 22, 2008 10:24 AM:
I must have missed that part. Where in the Ten Commandments does God insist that we must 'not judge?' "
shrubeater wrote on Jun 22, 2008 10:20 AM:
shrubeater wrote on Jun 22, 2008 10:03 AM:
Brian wrote on Jun 22, 2008 8:46 AM:
that may be offensive to gays. "
Brian wrote on Jun 22, 2008 8:44 AM:
Oh, what a tangled web the left weaves. "
Winston Wallace wrote on Jun 22, 2008 8:20 AM:
Priests and pastors will be arrested and imprisoned. Christians, Jews, and Muslims will have to go underground to practice their religion. Edmund Bruke said "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Many good people see no threat at all and therein lies most of the problem. Don't you think in hindsight the American Indian regrets letting that first covered wagon cross the Great Plains? "
Brian wrote on Jun 21, 2008 8:36 PM:
If you have the courage you should contact Dennis Prager and arrange to have a debate with him on this issue or contact him on the phone when he is on the radio. Pragerradio.com
You might be quite surprised to find many of Prager's views are probably the same as yours, except for this issue. I know Ken Owen shares many of Prager's views. I've known Ken since I was in grade school and when I attended Century Assembly Church. "
Brian wrote on Jun 21, 2008 8:30 PM:
The third group of supporters of same-sex marriage is the religious Left. Their social values are generally identical to those of the secular Left, but they think of those values as religious. These Jews and Christians say they support same-sex marriage not despite their religious identity, but because of it. "
Brian wrote on Jun 21, 2008 8:28 PM:
Proponents of same-sex marriage fall into three categories.
One is the secular Left -- people who seek to end the dominance of Judeo-Christian values in American life. These individuals tend to be the leaders and among the most active supporters of same-sex marriage.
They are animated by their fear and loathing of Bible-based Christians (and Jews) whom they regard as religious fanatics. Destroying the Judeo-Christian definition of marriage is one part of the secular Left's assault. Every vestige of Judeo-Christian America is targeted: public celebrations of Christmas, the mention of God in public schools, "In God We Trust" on our money, the use of the Bible at inaugurations, and much more.
But the end of Judeo-Christian marriage would be by far the Left's biggest success in remaking America in its image.
A second group consists of many well-meaning Americans who are not leftists and who do not yearn for the end of Judeo-Christian values. They simply believe that same-sex marriage is either the right thing to do or, even if wrong, not a big deal. Cont. "
Brian wrote on Jun 21, 2008 8:24 PM:
There is nothing in mainstream Christianity or Judaism that supports same-sex marriage. There is nothing biblically supportive -- and there is much biblically opposed -- and there was not one major religious leader or thinker in Jewish or Christian history prior to the present generation who argued for same-sex marriage.
Religious supporters of same-sex marriage have either substituted their own feelings for God, for the Bible, and for religious law or they have simply attached a cross or a yarmulke to their leftist politics. "
Brian wrote on Jun 21, 2008 8:12 PM:
Oh, Bob Matheis, this is for you too. "
jess wrote on Jun 21, 2008 6:57 PM:
Bob, I have to agree. Thank you for speaking out. "
Brian wrote on Jun 21, 2008 9:16 AM:
"It is about time with our culture and our current understanding of homosexuality. I have come to believe that it's not something one chooses; it's something that one discovers about themselves.
Winston Wallace Wrote: These supports are now crumbling and what was once unthinkable will be the norm.Words will mean the opposite of what they once meant and the people will drown in a cesspool of moral relativism.The sewer line cracked and broke slowly as it ran into the river of morality and standards. Some could see and taste the stench but many never knew the difference between the two and find it puzzling that some still fight to save that river. " "
sam wrote on Jun 21, 2008 8:33 AM:
This time I am wide awake and paying attention. "
Brian wrote on Jun 21, 2008 8:32 AM:
Winston, Well Put. "
Winston Wallace wrote on Jun 21, 2008 8:16 AM:
shrubeater wrote on Jun 21, 2008 7:40 AM:
girard74 wrote on Jun 20, 2008 11:02 PM:
And this means what, exactly? Are you suggesting that the machines were tampered with to bring in the vote for Bush?
For almost as long as I can remember Ohio has always been considered a pivotal state in national elections. To the dismissal of nearly all other states, Florida, Michigan and Ohio (and a few others) have always been the states to 'watch' on election night.
After the 2000 election, Bush without question had the electoral votes necessary to be the 43rd President of the United States. No one denies that Gore received the popular vote, but as we all know it is the 'electoral' vote that matters. If this is a problem (which I believe it is) then the Constitution should be amended. Regardless, Florida was key then and after multiple recounts of that state's votes, Bush won albeit by the narrowest of margins. "
shrubeater wrote on Jun 20, 2008 9:50 PM:
shrubeater wrote on Jun 20, 2008 9:45 PM:
sam wrote on Jun 20, 2008 7:33 PM:
Me... sam... I am sam that sam I am. I picked the name just because I LOVE green eggs and ham. "
shrubeater wrote on Jun 20, 2008 7:07 PM:
Winston Wallace wrote on Jun 20, 2008 4:57 PM:
OTH wrote on Jun 19, 2008 8:47 PM:
You sound like a very wise and knowledgeable man, who grew up in a very loving and caring household May you continue in your knowledge and wisdom all the rest of your life. "
marie wrote on Jun 19, 2008 6:22 AM:
girard74 wrote on Jun 19, 2008 12:52 AM:
Most people simply do not understand why there is a need to hold parades and other public exhibitions to celebrate any sexual preference, gay, straight or otherwise. Even here on this blog while there are many hateful opponents to same-sex marriage there are equally as many exhibiting the same hateful rhetoric to attack their heterosexual counterparts.
Although I will be pilloried for this dialogue, I suggest that the best way to convince the voters of California that same-sex marriage is not harmful (thereby possibly soothing their fear) is to tone down the rhetoric. The louder and more militant the gay community becomes, the smaller their chances of prevailing in November. Unfortunately, it may be too late to do any good. "
sam wrote on Jun 18, 2008 11:16 PM:
Just love.. that's it. When things hurt so bad that you cannot bear it, turn to the nearest person and just love.
Life is way too short to hate. "
girard74 wrote on Jun 18, 2008 10:53 PM:
Most people simply do not understand why there is a need to hold parades and other public exhibitions to celebrate any sexual preference, gay, straight or otherwise. Even here on this blog while there are many hateful opponents to same-sex marriage there are equally as many exhibiting the same hateful rhetoric to attack their heterosexual counterparts.
Although I will be pilloried for this dialogue, I suggest that the best way to convince the voters of California that same-sex marriage is not harmful (thereby possibly soothing their fear) is to tone down the rhetoric. The louder and more militant the gay community becomes, the smaller their chances of prevailing in November. Unfortunately, it may be too late to do any good. "
girard74 wrote on Jun 18, 2008 10:20 PM:
Yes, every county is now enforcing the law permitting same-sex marriage in California. It has already been opined that 'if' the proposed amendment to the California Constitution to define marriage as between a man and a woman passes in November, the same-sex marriages performed between now and then will remain valid.
My question to those who are praising this court for reversing this law, will you be as equally magnanimous toward the majority of voters in California if they reverse this ruling by Constitutional amendment? "
shrubeater wrote on Jun 18, 2008 8:44 PM:
shrubeater wrote on Jun 18, 2008 8:41 PM:
shrubeater wrote on Jun 18, 2008 8:37 PM:
sam wrote on Jun 18, 2008 5:05 PM:
for your life. Live hard and live well... and love lots. You want to condemn??? Look at yourself, but be gentle. You are only a human.
If religion is not your thing, then be thankful for the fact that you have witnessed another sunrise.
Life is too good to waste a breath on hate. "
Metric Time System wrote on Jun 18, 2008 10:04 AM:
Culture is what should conform to God's will in our lives.By pursuing sinful lifestyles, we are telling God His word is in error. God is irrelevant, doesn't understand current culture, made a mistake.God is wrong.
Homosexuality isn't a new subject, it's ancient, has always been an issue, and God has never condoned sin.
As a Pastor, you have the highest responsilbility.How can you stand in judgement of God? "
nylodian wrote on Jun 18, 2008 9:14 AM:
Leonard wrote on Jun 18, 2008 6:32 AM:
Hey, I was writing at 5:00 in the morning... "
Leonard wrote on Jun 18, 2008 3:17 AM:
the biggest law being violated in a gay relationship would be Darwins. An organisms main drive is to stay alive, and procreate.
I read an article recently about an Marine who had been wounded in Iraq and was marrying the woman who had been his caregiver. This poor guy had basically lost everything from the waste down to an IED. The article said that the couple hoped to eventually adopt.
I suppose you could argue that they are "violating Darwin's law" by wanting to celebrate their love but... "
lodi boy wrote on Jun 18, 2008 1:10 AM:
Cogito wrote on Jun 17, 2008 9:08 PM:
sam wrote on Jun 17, 2008 8:53 PM:
Awesome blog. "
sam wrote on Jun 17, 2008 8:51 PM:
Spoken like a REAL Christian. Thank you. "
sam wrote on Jun 17, 2008 8:48 PM:
I would love to hear, without using one's religious beliefs, why gay marriage is wrong. One cannot condemn someone based on his own religious beliefs, unless these beliefs are universally accepted.
The only one you can condemn with your own personal religious beliefs is yourself. Not all believe the same as you. "
Cogito wrote on Jun 17, 2008 8:44 PM:
shrubeater wrote on Jun 17, 2008 8:32 PM:
Cogito wrote on Jun 17, 2008 8:20 PM:
Cogito wrote on Jun 17, 2008 8:15 PM:
voter wrote on Jun 17, 2008 8:13 PM:
Cogito wrote on Jun 17, 2008 8:13 PM:
Cogito wrote on Jun 17, 2008 8:07 PM:
voter wrote on Jun 17, 2008 8:06 PM:
shrubeater wrote on Jun 17, 2008 7:57 PM:
jeff wrote on Jun 17, 2008 7:57 PM:
I read an exerpt with my class and had them discuss it. "
jeff wrote on Jun 17, 2008 7:54 PM:
'By 2002, 36 states had repealed all sodomy laws or had them overturned by court rulings. The remaining anti-homosexual sodomy laws have been invalidated by the 2003 U.S. Supreme Court decision Lawrence v. Texas' "
Cogito wrote on Jun 17, 2008 7:51 PM:
jeff wrote on Jun 17, 2008 7:46 PM:
Cogito wrote on Jun 17, 2008 7:39 PM:
voter wrote on Jun 17, 2008 6:34 PM: